Hail Vulnerability Model — v1.6 Physics

Damage probability is computed using a physically grounded stone-population model. Rather than mapping peak MESH directly to a damage ratio, the model distributes stone impacts across the realistic hail size spectrum — where the largest stones are rare outliers, not the norm. A surface-occurrence correction accounts for hail that melts or evaporates before reaching the ground.

Algorithm

  1. Peak MRMS MESH is corrected for radar calibration bias (Ortega 2018: 0.75×) and storm type (supercell 1.15×) to estimate the effective largest stone diameter Dl.
  2. Grieser & Hill (2019) power-law fits give average stone diameter Da, storm duration T, and hit rate Hr as functions of Dl, calibrated on 37,726 CoCoRaHS ground-truth observations.
  3. Stone size distribution follows a Gamma distribution (α = 1.75; Li et al. 2024) between 5 mm and Dl.
  4. Each 1mm size bin is assigned a damage probability via a lognormal fragility curve for unrated asphalt shingle (θ = 46 mm, γ = 0.25; Li et al. 2024).
  5. Aggregate Pfail = 1 − ∏(1 − pi)Ni across all size bins. Duration exposure applied as cap-limited multiplier (max 1.4×).
  6. Ackermann et al. (2024) HDE sigmoid surface-occurrence correction: Psurface = 1/(1 + e−0.18(MESH−27)). Accounts for hail melting and evaporating aloft before reaching the ground. Main effect at swath edges (1.0″–1.5″ MESH).

Key Parameters

MRMS radar correction0.75× (Ortega 2018)
Gamma shape α1.75 (Li et al. 2024 central estimate)
Fragility median θ46 mm (~1.8″) — unrated asphalt shingle
Fragility dispersion γ0.25 (lognormal)
HDE sigmoid inflection27 mm MESH (~1.06″)
Storm type multiplierSupercell 1.15× Dl
Roof RCVFootprint × 1.15 slope × $9/sqft

Validation Note

Published insured loss for the Jun 7, 2022 multi-state outbreak: ~$1.9B (NCEI billion-dollar catalog, all perils, all states). This model covers Nebraska roof loss only. Roof loss is estimated at 55–60% of total insured; NE is the dominant state by structure density. Model output of $145.9M reflects roof-only scope against footprint-based RCV at 2021 pricing.

References

Grieser, J. & Hill, M. (2019). How to Express Hail Intensity. J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol. 58, 2329–2344. DOI: 10.1175/JAMC-D-18-0334.1
Li, Y., Porter, K. & Goda, K. (2024). Hail hazard modeling with uncertainty analysis. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduction 113, 104853. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104853
Ackermann, L. et al. (2024). HDE surface-occurrence probability for MESH. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 17, 407–422. DOI: 10.5194/amt-17-407-2024
Ortega, K.L. (2018). Evaluating Multi-Radar Multi-Sensor Products for Surface Hailfall Diagnosis. Electronic J. Operational Meteor. 19(1), 1–21.
Buildings colored by hail damage ratio — supercell 1.15× + HDE sigmoid + duration multipliers. Click a building for full model output.
Loading map data…